Volume 10 Issue 4
您当前的位置:首页 > 期刊文章 > 过刊浏览 > Volume 10 (2012) > Volume 10 Issue 4
Jiao, D., Ma, Y., & Cao, F. (2012). Hydrodesulfurization catalyst prepared by urea-matrix combustion method. Particuology, 10(4), 468–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2012.01.001
Hydrodesulfurization catalyst prepared by urea-matrix combustion method
Dongmei Jiao a b, Yeyong Ma c, Fahai Cao a *
a School of Chemical Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, 130 Meilong Road, Shanghai, China
b Luoyang Petrochemical Complex of SINOPEC, 1 Zhongyuan Road, Luoyang, China
c Petro-Cyber Works Information Technology Co., Ltd., 192 Eshan Road, Shanghai, China
10.1016/j.partic.2012.01.001
Volume 10, Issue 4, August 2012, Pages 468-474
Received 9 March 2011, Accepted 16 September 2011, Available online 9 February 2012.
E-mail: fhcao@ecust.edu.cn

Highlights
Abstract

Co–Mo/γ-Al2O3–TiO2 hydrodesulfurization (HDS) catalyst samples prepared by a urea matrix combustion (UMxC) method, were evaluated in a stainless tubular fixed-bed reactor, with thiophene, benzothiophene and dibenzothiophene in xylene as model feedstocks. The samples were pre-sulfurized using a cyclohexane solution of 3% CS2 and then tested for the HDS reaction. The test results were compared with catalysts prepared by conventional methods involving sequential impregnation (SI) and co-impregnation (CI). The catalysts were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), laser Raman spectroscopy (LRS), high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and N2 physisorption, showing that the UMxC catalyst had higher pore volume and surface area than those prepared by the CI and SI methods. The UMxC method increased metal loading and avoided formation of inert phase, e.g., β-CoMoO4, for the HDS reaction, suggesting that UMxC method is superior to the conventional impregnation techniques. TiO2 promoter made particles on the catalyst surface closer and alleviated the interaction between molybdenum oxide and the support, and facilitated the formation of well-dispersed Co- and Mo-oxo species on catalyst surface, thus resulting in higher HDS catalytic activity than pure γ-Al2O3 support without modifiers. Consequently, the addition of TiO2 obviously improved the HDS conversion of dibenzothiophene.

Graphical abstract
Keywords
Hydrodesulfurization; Co–Mo catalyst; Al2O3–TiO2 support; Urea-matrix combustion method; Preparation