Volume 15
您当前的位置:首页 > 期刊文章 > 过刊浏览 > Volumes 12-17 (2014) > Volume 15
Han, M., Zeng, J., Xia, J., & Liao, S. (2014). Effect of thermal treatment on structural change of anode electrocatalysts for direct methanol fuel cells. Particuology, 15, 45–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2012.12.007
Effect of thermal treatment on structural change of anode electrocatalysts for direct methanol fuel cells
Mingjia Han, Jianhuang Zeng *, Jianwei Xia, Shijun Liao
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, South China University of Technology, Key Laboratory of Fuel Cell Technology of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou 510641, China
10.1016/j.partic.2012.12.007
Volume 15, August 2014, Pages 45-50
Received 21 September 2012, Revised 21 November 2012, Accepted 4 December 2012, Available online 14 March 2013.
E-mail: cejhzeng@scut.edu.cn

Highlights

► Carbon supported Pt, PtCo, PtRu catalysts are subjected to heat-treatment. 

► Heating induced structural changes of the catalysts were investigated. 

► Different performance of heated PtCo, PtRu catalysts is likely due to difference in atomic ratios.

Abstract

Commercially available carbon-supported Pt, PtCo and PtRu catalysts from E-TEK are heat-treated in turn at 600 °C and 800 °C each for an hour. The as-received and as-heated catalysts are used as anode catalysts for direct methanol fuel cells. Structural and surface composition changes induced by heating are analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), respectively. For the Pt catalyst, heating the catalysts caused only the mass activity decrease due to particle sintering, whereas the specific activity and CO tolerance remained unchanged. The performance of the PtCo and PtRu catalysts is affected differently by heating. Heating the PtRu catalyst adversely affects its catalytic activity and its CO tolerance due to Pt depletion at the surface. In contrast, although Pt depletion also takes place for the heated PtCo catalysts, these catalysts show an even higher specific activity and approximately the same CO tolerance. The observed difference is likely due to the optimum atomic ratio difference for Ru/Pt and Co/Pt; an increased atomic ratio on the surface for Co/Pt results in an activity enhancement, which is contrary to the effect of the increase of Ru/Pt atomic ratio.

Graphical abstract
Keywords
Structural changes; Methanol electrooxidation; CO tolerance; Pt depletion