Volume 33
您当前的位置:首页 > 期刊文章 > 过刊浏览 > Volumes 30-35 (2017) > Volume 33
Li, H., Zheng, X., Ji, H., Huang, Z., Wang, B., & Li, H. (2017). Void fraction measurement of bubble and slug flow in a small channel using the multivision technique. Particuology, 33, 11-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2016.11.004
Void fraction measurement of bubble and slug flow in a small channel using the multivision technique
Huajun Li, Xiaohu Zheng, Haifeng Ji *, Zhiyao Huang, Baoliang Wang, Haiqing Li
State Key Laboratory of Industrial Control Technology, College of Control Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
10.1016/j.partic.2016.11.004
Volume 33, August 2017, Pages 11-16
Received 25 October 2016, Accepted 23 November 2016, Available online 12 April 2017, Version of Record 13 June 2017.
E-mail: hfji@iipc.zju.edu.cn; hfji@zju.edu.cn

Highlights

• A new void fraction measurement method based on multivision technique was proposed.

• The multivision system was developed to obtain images from two perpendicular directions.

• A new void fraction measurement model was developed to determine the void fraction.


Abstract

Using the multivision technique, a new void fraction measurement method was developed for bubble and slug flow in a small channel. The multivision system was developed to obtain images of the two-phase flow in two perpendicular directions. The obtained images were processed—using image segmentation, image subtraction, Canny edge detection, binarization, and hole filling—to extract the phase boundaries and information about the bubble or slug parameters. With the extracted information, a new void fraction measurement model was developed and used to determine the void fraction of the two-phase flow. The proposed method was validated experimentally in horizontal and vertical channels with different inner diameters of 2.1, 2.9, and 4.0 mm. The proposed method of measuring the void fraction has better performance than the methods that use images acquired in only one direction, with a maximum absolute difference between the measured and reference values of less than 6%.

Graphical abstract
Keywords
Gas–liquid two-phase flow; Void fraction; Bubble flow; Slug flow; Multivision technique