Volume 37
您当前的位置:首页 > 期刊文章 > 过刊浏览 > Volumes 36-41 (2018) > Volume 37
Nicosia, A., Manodori, L., Trentini, A., Ricciardelli, I., Bacco, D., Poluzzi, V., . . . Belosi, F. (2018). Field study of a soft X-ray aerosol neutralizer combined with electrostatic classifiers for nanoparticle size distribution measurements. Particuology, 37, 99-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2017.08.001
Field study of a soft X-ray aerosol neutralizer combined with electrostatic classifiers for nanoparticle size distribution measurements
Alessia Nicosia a b, Laura Manodori c, Arianna Trentini d, Isabella Ricciardelli d, Dimitri Bacco d, Vanes Poluzzi d, Lorenza Di Matteo e, Franco Belosi a *
a Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate (ISAC)-CNR, Bologna, Italy
b Department of Physics and Earth Sciences, University of Ferrara, 44122, Ferrara, Italy
c ECSIN — European Center for the Sustainable Impact of Nanotechnology, Veneto Nanotech Scpa, Rovigo, Italy
d Regional Agency for Prevention, Environment and Energy of Emilia-Romagna (ARPAE), Bologna, Italy
e University of Eastern Piedmont “A. Avogadro”, Department of Science and Technology Innovation, Alessandria, Italy
10.1016/j.partic.2017.08.001
Volume 37, April 2018, Pages 99-106
Received 23 February 2017, Revised 9 August 2017, Accepted 11 August 2017, Available online 21 November 2017, Version of Record 3 February 2018.
E-mail: f.belosi@isac.cnr.it

Highlights

• A comparison between a soft X-ray (SXR) neutralizer and radioactive neutralizers was made.

• Particle penetration inside SXR neutralizer was parameterized with equivalent pipe length method.

• SXR neutralizer could be used with particle sizer spectrometers to replace radioactive one.


Abstract

Most conventional aerosol neutralizers are based on radioactive sources, which are controlled by strict regulations restricting their handling, transport, and storage. The TSI 3087 soft X-ray (SXR) neutralizer circumvents these legal restrictions. The aim of the present work is to compare the performance of a standalone SXR aerosol neutralizer with that of conventional radioactive aerosol neutralizers based on 85Kr (TSI 3077) and 241Am (Grimm 5522) by performing field tests in a real environmental scenario. The results obtained when the SXR neutralizer was connected to a mobility particle sizer spectrometer (MPS), different from the device suggested by the manufacturer, were comparable with those obtained with the use of radioactive aerosol neutralizers. In changing the neutralizer, the particle number concentrations, measured with the MPS connected to the SXR neutralizer, almost remained within the 10% uncertainty bounds for the particle size interval 10–300 nm, when diffusion losses inside the SXR tube were considered. Based on our comparisons, the SXR neutralizer can be regarded as a standalone instrument that could solve the problems associated with legal restrictions on radioactive neutralizers and fulfil the need for a portable instrument for different field test purposes.

Graphical abstract
Keywords
Aerosol neutralizer; Soft X-ray non-radioactive charger; Mobility particle sizer spectrometer; Particle size distribution; Diffusion losses