Volume 38
您当前的位置:首页 > 期刊文章 > 过刊浏览 > Volumes 36-41 (2018) > Volume 38
Haghgoo, M. R., Bergstrom, D. J., & Spiteri, R. J. (2018). Effect of particle stress tensor in simulations of dense gas–particle flows in fluidized beds. Particuology, 38, 31-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2017.04.010
Effect of particle stress tensor in simulations of dense gas–particle flows in fluidized beds
Mohammad Reza Haghgoo a *, Donald J. Bergstrom a, Raymond J. Spiteri b
a Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A9, Canada
b Department of Computer Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5C9, Canada
10.1016/j.partic.2017.04.010
Volume 38, June 2018, Pages 31-43
Received 25 October 2016, Revised 30 March 2017, Accepted 12 April 2017, Available online 31 August 2017, Version of Record 2 April 2018.
E-mail: reza.haghgoo@usask.ca; haghgoo_reza@yahoo.com

Highlights

• Two-fluid model simulation of a dense gas–particle flow in a 3D fluidized bed.

• Analysis of the flow properties for a range of gas–particle regimes based on the inertial number.

• Significance of the resolved-scale particle Reynolds stress.

• Significant role of the particle stress tensor in the elastic-inertial regime.


Abstract

A two-fluid model based on the kinetic theory of granular flow for the rapid-flow regime and the Coulomb friction law for the quasi-static regime is applied to predict the hydrodynamics of dense gas–particle flow in a three-dimensional fluidized bed. Two different models for the particle stress tensor that use different constitutive equations in the elastic-inertial regime are examined to assess their ability to predict bed dynamics. To understand how particle stress models affect structural features of the flow, a quantitative analysis is performed on some important aspects of the mechanics of bubbling beds that have received relatively little attention in the literature. Accordingly, different flow regimes are identified in the context of fluidized beds through the dimensionless inertial number, and the main characteristics of each regime are discussed. In addition, how the particle stress tensor manifests itself in the bubble characteristics, natural frequency of the bed, and particle Reynolds stress are investigated, all of which help to better understand the complex dynamics of the fluidized bed. The numerical results are validated against published experimental data and demonstrate the significant role of the stress tensor in the elastic-inertial regime.

Graphical abstract
Keywords
Two-fluid model; Inertial number; Fluidized bed; Flow regime; Particle Reynolds stress; MFIX