Volume 39
您当前的位置:首页 > 期刊文章 > 过刊浏览 > Volumes 36-41 (2018) > Volume 39
Li, G., & Lu, Y. (2018). Cyclone separation in a supercritical water circulating fluidized bed reactor for coal/biomass gasification: Structural design and numerical analysis. Particuology, 39, 55-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2017.08.005
Cyclone separation in a supercritical water circulating fluidized bed reactor for coal/biomass gasification: Structural design and numerical analysis
Guoxing Li, Youjun Lu *
State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710049, China
10.1016/j.partic.2017.08.005
Volume 39, August 2018, Pages 55-67
Received 13 July 2017, Revised 5 August 2017, Accepted 31 August 2017, Available online 17 January 2018, Version of Record 17 May 2018.
E-mail: yjlu@mail.xjtu.edu.cn

Highlights

• Two cyclone separators used under supercritical conditions were devised and compared.

• CFD simulation of fluid flow fields and particles flow patterns in the cyclones were performed.

• Comparison of particle-separation performance between two cyclones was conducted.


Abstract

A new concept of a supercritical water (SCW) circulating fluidized bed reactor is proposed to produce hydrogen from coal/biomass gasification. The cyclone is a key component of the reactor system. In this paper, cyclones with a single circular inlet (SCI) or a double circular inlet (DCI) were designed to adapt to the supercritical conditions. We evaluated the separation performance of the two cyclones using numerical simulations. A three-dimensional Reynolds stress model was used to simulate the turbulent flow of the fluid, and a stochastic Lagrangian model was used to simulate the particle motion. The flow fields of both cyclones were three-dimensionally unsteady and similar to those of traditional gas–solid cyclones. Secondary circulation phenomena were discovered and their influence on particle separation was estimated. Analyzing the distribution of the turbulence kinetic energy revealed that the most intensive turbulence existed in the zone near the vortex finder while the flow in the central part was relatively stable. The particle concentration distribution was non-uniform because of centrifugal forces. The distribution area can be divided into three parts according to the motion of the particles. In addition, the separation efficiency of both cyclones increased with the inlet SCW velocity. Because of its perturbance flow, the DCI separator had higher separation efficiency than the SCI separator under comparable simulations. However, this was at the expense of a higher pressure drop across the cyclone.

Graphical abstract
Keywords
Cyclone; Structural design; Supercritical water–solid flow; Separation performance; Circulating fluidized bed; Computational fluid dynamics