- Volumes 84-95 (2024)
-
Volumes 72-83 (2023)
-
Volume 83
Pages 1-258 (December 2023)
-
Volume 82
Pages 1-204 (November 2023)
-
Volume 81
Pages 1-188 (October 2023)
-
Volume 80
Pages 1-202 (September 2023)
-
Volume 79
Pages 1-172 (August 2023)
-
Volume 78
Pages 1-146 (July 2023)
-
Volume 77
Pages 1-152 (June 2023)
-
Volume 76
Pages 1-176 (May 2023)
-
Volume 75
Pages 1-228 (April 2023)
-
Volume 74
Pages 1-200 (March 2023)
-
Volume 73
Pages 1-138 (February 2023)
-
Volume 72
Pages 1-144 (January 2023)
-
Volume 83
-
Volumes 60-71 (2022)
-
Volume 71
Pages 1-108 (December 2022)
-
Volume 70
Pages 1-106 (November 2022)
-
Volume 69
Pages 1-122 (October 2022)
-
Volume 68
Pages 1-124 (September 2022)
-
Volume 67
Pages 1-102 (August 2022)
-
Volume 66
Pages 1-112 (July 2022)
-
Volume 65
Pages 1-138 (June 2022)
-
Volume 64
Pages 1-186 (May 2022)
-
Volume 63
Pages 1-124 (April 2022)
-
Volume 62
Pages 1-104 (March 2022)
-
Volume 61
Pages 1-120 (February 2022)
-
Volume 60
Pages 1-124 (January 2022)
-
Volume 71
- Volumes 54-59 (2021)
- Volumes 48-53 (2020)
- Volumes 42-47 (2019)
- Volumes 36-41 (2018)
- Volumes 30-35 (2017)
- Volumes 24-29 (2016)
- Volumes 18-23 (2015)
- Volumes 12-17 (2014)
- Volume 11 (2013)
- Volume 10 (2012)
- Volume 9 (2011)
- Volume 8 (2010)
- Volume 7 (2009)
- Volume 6 (2008)
- Volume 5 (2007)
- Volume 4 (2006)
- Volume 3 (2005)
- Volume 2 (2004)
- Volume 1 (2003)
• Gas–solid flow pattern is well simulated by the Barracuda software.
• Pressure drop in the solid feed/discharge tubes are computed by proposed methods.
• Gas frictional/local resistances dominate pressure drop in solid feed/discharge tubes.
• Solid flux equation is given considering both pressure drop and air lock factors.
The gas–solid flow pattern in a rectangular cross-flow moving bed is simulated by the multiphase particle-in-cell (MP-PIC) model with the Barracuda software. The computed results are verified by the experimental data. In the bed, the actual solid flux generally equals the solid flow rates in the solid feed and discharge tubes. However, these two flow rates are greatly influenced by the air lock and the pressure drop in the solid feed and discharge tubes, namely, the negative and positive pressure gradients, respectively, rather than the traditional opinion that they are merely controlled by the valve openings. The pressure drops in these tubes are calculated by the proposed “common pressure pool with multiple outlets” (CPPMO) and the “common pressure pool” (CPP) methods. It is found that the local gas resistance dominates the pressure drop in the solid discharge tubes, while the gas frictional resistance determines the pressure drop in the solid feed tube. In addition, when the solid flow rate nearly tends to zero in the solid feed tube, the air lock forms. A solid flux equation is then given by considering both the air lock and the pressure drop factors in the cross-flow moving bed.