Volume 60
您当前的位置:首页 > 期刊文章 > 过刊浏览 > Volumes 60-71 (2022) > Volume 60
Hao, W., & Zhu, Q. (2022). Operating range of magnetic stabilization flow regime for magnetized fluidized bed with Geldart-B magnetizable and nonmagnetizable particles. Particuology, 60, 90-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2021.02.004
Operating range of magnetic stabilization flow regime for magnetized fluidized bed with Geldart-B magnetizable and nonmagnetizable particles
Weikang Hao a b, Quanhong Zhu b c *
a College of Chemical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China
b Qingdao Institue of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266101, Shandong, China
c Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
10.1016/j.partic.2021.02.004
Volume 60, January 2022, Pages 90-98
Received 27 November 2020, Revised 4 February 2021, Accepted 5 February 2021, Available online 8 April 2021, Version of Record 23 October 2021.
E-mail: zhuqh87@163.com

Highlights
  • It was not feasible to determine UmbH from the οPbUg curve for admixture MFB.
  • UmbH could be identified from ϿP Ug  curve in uniform and steady magnetic field.
  • Absolute operating range of magnetic stabilization varied hardly with dpM.
  • Operating range of magnetic stabilization increased as ϿpM decreased.
  • Operating range of magnetic stabilization did not vary monotonously with UmfM.


Abstract

The magnetic stabilization flow regime could also be created for Geldart-B nonmagnetizable particles provided some magnetizable particles are introduced and the magnetic field is applied. This study aimed to explore the size (dpM) and density (ϿpM) effects of magnetizable particles on its operating range. The upper limit (UmbH) could not be determined from the οPb Ug curve but could from analyzing the variation of οPb-fluctuation with increasing Ug. Due to the variation of UmfH (lower limit) with dpM and ϿpM, both UmbH UmfH and (UmbH UmfH)/UmfH were used to quantify the operating range of magnetic stabilization. UmbH UmfH varied hardly with dpM but increased significantly with decreasing ϿpM. (UmbH UmfH)/UmfH increased as dpM or ϿpM decreased. It was more difficult for the nonmagnetizable particles to escape from the network formed by the smaller/lighter magnetizable particles. For the same magnitude of change, dpM had a stronger effect than ϿpM on (UmbH UmfH)/UmfH. Neither UmbH UmfH nor (UmbH UmfH)/UmfH varied monotonously with the minimum fluidization velocity of the magnetizable particles, indicating that no straightforward criterion for matching the magnetizable particles to the given nonmagnetizable particles could be established based on their minimum fluidization velocities to maximize the operating range of magnetic stabilization.

Graphical abstract
Keywords
Magnetized fluidized bed; Binary mixture; Magnetic stabilization; Operating range; Nonmagnetizable particles; Magnetization-FIRST