- Volumes 84-95 (2024)
-
Volumes 72-83 (2023)
-
Volume 83
Pages 1-258 (December 2023)
-
Volume 82
Pages 1-204 (November 2023)
-
Volume 81
Pages 1-188 (October 2023)
-
Volume 80
Pages 1-202 (September 2023)
-
Volume 79
Pages 1-172 (August 2023)
-
Volume 78
Pages 1-146 (July 2023)
-
Volume 77
Pages 1-152 (June 2023)
-
Volume 76
Pages 1-176 (May 2023)
-
Volume 75
Pages 1-228 (April 2023)
-
Volume 74
Pages 1-200 (March 2023)
-
Volume 73
Pages 1-138 (February 2023)
-
Volume 72
Pages 1-144 (January 2023)
-
Volume 83
-
Volumes 60-71 (2022)
-
Volume 71
Pages 1-108 (December 2022)
-
Volume 70
Pages 1-106 (November 2022)
-
Volume 69
Pages 1-122 (October 2022)
-
Volume 68
Pages 1-124 (September 2022)
-
Volume 67
Pages 1-102 (August 2022)
-
Volume 66
Pages 1-112 (July 2022)
-
Volume 65
Pages 1-138 (June 2022)
-
Volume 64
Pages 1-186 (May 2022)
-
Volume 63
Pages 1-124 (April 2022)
-
Volume 62
Pages 1-104 (March 2022)
-
Volume 61
Pages 1-120 (February 2022)
-
Volume 60
Pages 1-124 (January 2022)
-
Volume 71
- Volumes 54-59 (2021)
- Volumes 48-53 (2020)
- Volumes 42-47 (2019)
- Volumes 36-41 (2018)
- Volumes 30-35 (2017)
- Volumes 24-29 (2016)
- Volumes 18-23 (2015)
- Volumes 12-17 (2014)
- Volume 11 (2013)
- Volume 10 (2012)
- Volume 9 (2011)
- Volume 8 (2010)
- Volume 7 (2009)
- Volume 6 (2008)
- Volume 5 (2007)
- Volume 4 (2006)
- Volume 3 (2005)
- Volume 2 (2004)
- Volume 1 (2003)
• Particle convective heat transfer (hpc) in supercritical water fluidized bed is studied by single particle model.
• Particle residence time increases with thermal gradient layer thickness (λ).
• Particle residence time distribution near the wall follows a gamma function.
• hpc first decreases and then increases with rising λ at higher velocity.
Supercritical water fluidized bed (SCWFB) is a promising reactor to gasify biomass or coal. Its optimization design is closely related to wall-to-bed heat transfer, where particle convective heat transfer plays an important role. This paper evaluates the particle convective heat transfer coefficient (hpc) at the wall in SCWFB using the single particle model. The critical parameters in the single particle model which is difficult to get experimentally are obtained by the computational fluid dynamics-discrete element method (CFD-DEM). The contact statistics related to particle-to-wall heat transfer, such as contact number and contact distance, are also presented. The results show that particle residence time (τ), as the key parameter to evaluate hpc, is found to decrease with rising velocity, while increase with larger thermal boundary layer thickness. τ follows a gamma function initially adopted in the gas–solid fluidized bed, making it possible to evaluate hpc in SCWFB by a simplified single particle model. The theoretical predicted hpc tends to increase with rising thermal gradient thickness at a lower velocity (1.5 Umf), while first decreases and then increases at higher velocity (1.75 and 2 Umf). hpc occupies 30%–57% of the overall wall-to-bed heat transfer coefficient for a particle diameter of 0.25 mm. The results are helpful to predict the overall wall-to-bed heat transfer coefficient in SCWFB combined with a reasonable fluid convective heat transfer model from a theoretical perspective.